Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:37
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Texas, Oklahoma and Nevada make changes to lure business amid Delaware’s ‘Dexit’ concern - AP News
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What is your favourite true story to tell at a party?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What is your best and worst childhood memory? What was your biggest fear as a child?
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why am I more attracted to black men?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What do people aim for when they meditate, and how do they do it properly?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
My Husband Drinks a Pot of Coffee a Day—So I Asked the Experts If That's Safe - EatingWell
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ryan Mountcastle To Miss 8-12 Weeks - MLB Trade Rumors
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.